Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”
by 13years on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @05:10PM
(#34811418)
Yes, didn't mean to imply there is no progress, just that some perceive that we are all of a sudden getting close to AGI from their first impressions of ChatGPT.
Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”
by hinkley on Thursday February 16, 2023 @11:24AM
(#34820772)
My professional opinion is that we should be using AI like Bloom filters. Can we detect if the expensive calculation needs to be made or not. A 2% error rate in that situation is just an opex issue, not a publicity nightmare.
And I also agree that the AI like thing we have is nowhere near AGI.
And I also agree with rethinking the approach. The problem here is human AI is deeply entwined and optimized the problems of living things. Before we had humanlike intelligence we had 'do not get killed' and 'do not starve' intelligence. The general issue is AI doesn't have these concerns. This causes a set of alignment issues between human behavior an AI behavior. AI doesn't have any 'this causes death' filter inherent to its architecture and we'll poorly try to tack this on and wonder why it fails.