News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by theptip on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @02:39PM (#34809438)
If you think these systems are going to be no more capable than a magpie, then I think you're making a very big mistake, the sort of mistake that in our lifetime could plausible kill millions of people.

ChatGPT can already write code. A magpie cannot do that.

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by tptacek on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @02:52PM (#34809645)
That's one of those capabilities that seems super scary if you truly believe that writing code is one of the most important things a human can do. Computers have, of course, been writing computer programs for a long time. Next thing you know, they'll be beating us at chess.
Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by pharrington on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @03:12PM (#34809886)
I think you're confusing importance with power.
Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by amptorn on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @03:23PM (#34810029)
Can it execute code?
Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by int_19h on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @05:15PM (#34811505)
It can submit the code that it's written for execution if you tell it that it can, by utilizing specific markers in the output that get processed. There already are frameworks around this that make it possible to e.g. call an arbitrary Python function as part of answering the question.
Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by Zetice on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @05:06PM (#34811354)
That’s an easy prediction to make; at worst you’re cautious.

And it’s a powerful tool. Even staplers have rules around their use: no stapling people, no hitting people with a stapler, don’t use a staple to pick a lock, etc.

But nobody blames the stapler, is my point.