Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”
by Phemist on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @12:26PM
(#34807325)
And as was predicted, clippy will rise again.
Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”
by 6510 on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @12:40PM
(#34807540)
I can see the power point already: this tool goes on top of other windows and adjusts user behavior contextually.
Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”
by rdevsrex on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @01:36PM
(#34808484)
May he rise.
Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”
by bambax on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @12:27PM
(#34807345)
> Not sure people who hurt themselves following GPT instructions will have much more success in litigation than people who hurt themselves following other random website instructions
Joe's Big Blinking Blog is insolvent; Microsoft isn't.
Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”
by jcadam on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @01:03PM
(#34807935)
Another AI prediction: Targeted advertising becomes even more "targeted." With ads generated on the fly specific to an individual user - optimized to make you (specifically, you) click.
Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”
by yamtaddle on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @01:16PM
(#34808153)
This, but for political propaganda/programming is gonna be really fun in the next few years.
One person able to put out as much material as ten could before, and potentially hyper targeted to maximize chance of guiding the readier/viewer down some nutty rabbit hole? Yeesh.
(Boring predictions: Microsoft quietly integrates some of the better language generation features into Word with a lot of rails in place, replaces ChatGPT answers with Alexa-style bot on rails answers for common questions in its chat interfaces but most people default to using search for search and Word for content generation, and creates ClippyGPT which is more amusing than useful just like its ancestor. And Google's search is threatened more by GPT spam than people using chatbots. Not sure people who hurt themselves following GPT instructions will have much more success in litigation than people who hurt themselves following other random website instructions, but I can see the lawyers getting big disclaimers ready just in case)