Re:The mysterious doodles hidden in a 1,300-year-old book
by OJFord on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @04:31AM
(#34801717)
That was my first thought, but I found the article way more interesting than the article suggests.
Lest anyone else be put off - the doodles are just one example of something not (or barely) visible without the new imaging techniques described. It's about finding new artefacts in an existing collection, not 'oh wow so weird an ancient human doodled something'.
Lest anyone else be put off - the doodles are just one example of something not (or barely) visible without the new imaging techniques described. It's about finding new artefacts in an existing collection, not 'oh wow so weird an ancient human doodled something'.