News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:$500 a Month, No Strings: Chicago Experiments with a Guar... by nwah1 on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @02:10PM (#34794367)
The well-known numbers that have been known since the Moynihan Report.
Re:$500 a Month, No Strings: Chicago Experiments with a Guar... by RC_ITR on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @07:31PM (#34798358)
Come on, give its full title...
Re:$500 a Month, No Strings: Chicago Experiments with a Guar... by toomanyrichies on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @07:46PM (#34798488)
I didn't know what it was either. OP is likely referring to this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Negro_Family:_The_Case_For...

Commonly known as the Moynihan Report. It has its supporters and its detractors. I have no opinion on it since this is the first I'm hearing of it.

Re:$500 a Month, No Strings: Chicago Experiments with a Guar... by GauntletWizard on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @07:46PM (#34798491)
At the time, the title was the opposite of a slur. Now, it would paint the report in a different light.
Re:$500 a Month, No Strings: Chicago Experiments with a Guar... by gotoeleven on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @07:47PM (#34798499)
United Negro College Fund

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People

Can't win an argument? Throw chaff in the air with some language policing.

Re:$500 a Month, No Strings: Chicago Experiments with a Guar... by quxbar on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @07:59PM (#34798585)
Not so much chaff as a point that the thing itself is so outdated our very language has had time to radically change.
Re:$500 a Month, No Strings: Chicago Experiments with a Guar... by RC_ITR on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @08:27PM (#34798854)
I will assume you've read the full document and are fine with the things it says, since you're so confident it's a well written/thought-out piece that just accidentally has an extremely outdated name.

I think it's a tough argument to make that single-mothers lead to resentful anti-social children, but, hey, maybe I should be more open-minded.

>...The primary unit may again become mother and child, the biologically given, and the special conditions under which man has held his social traditions in trust are violated and distorted.

E. Franklin Frazier makes clear that at the time of emancipation Negro women were already “accustomed to playing the dominant role in family and marriage relations” and that this role persisted in the decades of rural life that followed...

...Although the families studied were white, the pattern would clearly seem to be a general one, and apply to Negro families as well.

The first two stages end with the exhaustion of credit and the entry of the wife into the labor force. The father is no longer the provider and the elder children become resentful.

The third stage is the critical one of commencing a new day-to-day existence. At this point two women are in charge:

“Consider the fact that relief investigators or case workers are normally women and deal with the housewife. Already suffering a loss in prestige and authority in the family because of his failure to be the chief bread winner, the male head of the family feels deeply this obvious transfer of planning for the family’s well-being to two women, one of them an outsider. His role is reduced to that of errand boy to and from the relief office.”