Re:Hackers interrupt Iran president’s TV speech on anniversa...
by afarrell on Sunday February 12, 2023 @09:38AM
(#34763098)
Ah, then CNN could do a better job translating. "death to" and "down with" have pretty different meanings.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hackers interrupt Iran president’s TV speech on anniversa...
by mc32 on Sunday February 12, 2023 @09:55AM
(#34763230)
I think it’s more nuanced and can mean both, depending on what the speaker wants it to mean. Like two buddies trading insults )it could be banter or of could be a genuine insult). The tone denotes the meaning.
Re:Hackers interrupt Iran president’s TV speech on anniversa...
by unmole on Sunday February 12, 2023 @10:10AM
(#34763362)
Do you speak Farsi? The Hindustani variant Murdabad is never meant literally.
Re:Hackers interrupt Iran president’s TV speech on anniversa...
by selimthegrim on Sunday February 12, 2023 @10:16AM
(#34763417)
It’s still considered gauche, i.e. they tell you not to sloganeer with it at Indo-Pak border
Re:Hackers interrupt Iran president’s TV speech on anniversa...
by alephnerd on Sunday February 12, 2023 @11:48AM
(#34764302)
It used both literally and figuratively in Punjabi, Pahari, and Pashto as well.
Re:Hackers interrupt Iran president’s TV speech on anniversa...
by skissane on Sunday February 12, 2023 @09:55AM
(#34763231)
The problem they face, is it has become a well-known tradition in American (and Western) journalism, going at least back to the hostage crisis in 1979. If they change the translation now, people will attack them as pro-Iran/pro-regime/etc. It is possibly an even bigger problem when it comes to the use of the phrase against Israel; I wouldn’t be surprised if a change of translation in that context got labelled as anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, even antisemitic. The politically safest course is just to keep on doing what you’ve always done