News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Blowing Holes in Seymour Hersh's Pipe Dream by BWStearns on Friday February 10, 2023 @02:20PM (#34744369)
To the people are saying "oh this is just nitpicking", it's not. Hersh's claims are extraordinary[0], and require if not extraordinary evidence, at least evidence that's not sloppy as hell.

Given the subject matter it's completely reasonable that he could only have anonymous sources. But when you have anonymous sources then their information has to line up with reality. If it doesn't then you're either getting played or dealing with someone who has kind of lost it and maybe is exaggerating/misinterpreting information that they _do_ have access to. Getting basic claims wrong like the kind of boats involved, or the location of the attack, or the equipment required is disqualifying enough to disregard other more salacious claims.

That all said: the US may very well have been behind it, but Hersh does nothing to prove that in his original article in light of the inconsistencies.

[0] Not so extraordinary that we would blow up a pipeline, but that Biden would pull the silly "I'm-not-covert-actioning" word game. It's stupid and wouldn't shield him from accountability any more than just telling DevGru/DO(or whatever the abbreviation is now) not to tell gang of 8.

Re:Blowing Holes in Seymour Hersh's Pipe Dream by DeLeeuw on Saturday February 11, 2023 @04:24AM (#34750825)
Hersh' claims are not extraordinary. Someone blew up that pipeline. And the list of possible suspects is very, very short.
Re:Blowing Holes in Seymour Hersh's Pipe Dream by BWStearns on Saturday February 11, 2023 @03:39PM (#34756109)
.... I devoted a footnote to clarifying this