News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The $20 an hour Cessna 172 experiment by Retric on Friday February 10, 2023 @12:21AM (#34735928)
On average a new car buyers keeps their car 8.4 years, while cars are lasting 25 years. Thus new car buyers are literally quite different than the average American.

Anyway, that’s an unexpected 500$ expense. My point was people financing a 50+k new car could fairly easily buy a 17,600 car out of pocket by waiting a little longer before purchase. Large scale changes in purchasing habits would have significant knock on effects for the used car market, but that’s another story.

Re:The $20 an hour Cessna 172 experiment by beowulfey on Friday February 10, 2023 @08:33AM (#34739393)
Did you mean buying a new used car vs a new car? That would financially be a better choice for most americans, yes. But of course you then run into the uncertainty of how long the used car you buy might go before it needs major service. A riskier option that loosely reflects the Pratchett/Vimes “new boots” theory.
Re:The $20 an hour Cessna 172 experiment by Retric on Friday February 10, 2023 @10:40AM (#34741063)
No, I meant the cheapest new car vs the new car they can reasonably finance.
Re:The $20 an hour Cessna 172 experiment by gateorade on Friday February 10, 2023 @03:16PM (#34745181)
I guess I misunderstood your point. I was thinking you were saying that you thought most people walking into a dealership and getting loans a on 30k+ new car could afford to pay cash instead. For the same car.