Re:The $20 an hour Cessna 172 experiment
by jacquesm on Thursday February 09, 2023 @02:22PM
(#34729721)
They'll end up with a fraction of the range/payload of the old planes.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The $20 an hour Cessna 172 experiment
by ElevenLathe on Thursday February 09, 2023 @02:34PM
(#34729950)
Maybe that's fine if the point is just to go up on a Saturday for fun and land at the same field you took off from.
Re:The $20 an hour Cessna 172 experiment
by Toutouxc on Thursday February 09, 2023 @03:08PM
(#34730585)
I'd literally fly a bicycle with wings for fifteen minutes at a time if that made [fixed-wing] aviation more affordable. I live in one of the better-off eastern-bloc countries and I make significantly more than most people I know, but getting a PPL would almost certainly ruin me financially at this moment.
I know that paragliding and hang gliding exist, but those are a bit out of my comfort (and safety) zone.
Re:The $20 an hour Cessna 172 experiment
by jacquesm on Thursday February 09, 2023 @03:43PM
(#34731111)
There are clubs that own small aircraft that you can fly, I've done some time in these:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikarus_C42
Technically it is a microlight but top speed and handling are much closer to a regular GA craft. I absolutely loved it and if my eyesight was better I'd definitely go for a license.
Re:The $20 an hour Cessna 172 experiment
by outworlder on Thursday February 09, 2023 @05:27PM
(#34732577)
There are also actual gliders (aka soaring). These are planes in all but the engine, and are pretty safe.