I was with you until your last word, as infallible, according to my conservative sources, is a liberal dogwhistle.

And, now, thanks to that, I doubt everything else you wrote and will have to corroborate it with sources I trust more.

I feel again like you're not comprehending what I wrote, and I'm going to assume you're not intentionally being dishonest in doing so.

> without mindlessly discarding everything else the person said.

It's a good thing I didn't do that.

> That will be a very successful way to never have to challenge any of your opinions since nobody is infallible.

Funny because I don't have a strong opinion either way on how badly Musk has behaved relative to the Twitter acquisition, so there is no opinion of mine to even protect. Again, you don't seem to understand what the following statement means: "I don't trust what you're saying and will have to corroborate it with other sources". Because it definitely doesn't mean what you think it means.

> I feel again like you're not comprehending what I wrote, and I'm going to assume you're not intentionally being dishonest in doing so.

The feeling is quite literally mutual, unless this is some incredibly effective sarcasm and irony that you've written.