News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by PonySoldier on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @03:09PM (#34714163)
As someone else noted in another thread, Hersh's reputation and the source are absolutely evidence. What he hasn't provided is hard proof for the claims.

I can't find any proof whatsoever as to who actually did it from the western authorities claiming to investigate it either though. In fact, there's been little to no news or updates at all since the incident.

Re: by The_Colonel on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @03:44PM (#34714779)
> Hersh's reputation

Not an evidence.

> the source

Remains anonymous. Also, not an evidence.

Re: by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @03:52PM (#34714907)
> Hersh's reputation and the source are absolutely evidence

It’s a signal to pay attention to the issue. To keep an eye out for evidence. It’s not evidence per se.