News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by OscarCunningham on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @04:30AM (#34705984)
So I tried it with an image of a monkey that I often use for profile pictures (https://mathstodon.xyz/@OscarCunningham). This image wasn't made by Stable Diffusion. It gave me this prompt:

> a monkey plushie on a white background, photograph taken by steve buscemi from a zoom lens, studio lighting, ultrarealistic

Can someone tell me what Steve Buscemi is doing here?

Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by sublinear on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @04:40AM (#34706065)
Steve Buscemi -> Parting Glances -> AIDS -> monkeys ???
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by rf15 on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @04:38AM (#34706055)
This sounds a lot like the results you get from CLIP interrogation. Maybe they just use that and made another online service for it?
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by sahil_chaudhary on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @07:05AM (#34706972)
It is actually based on a different approach, it uses an image-captioning model finetuned on image-prompt pairs
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by xkapastel on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @08:39AM (#34707820)
CLIP Interrogator uses BLIP, an image captioning model, as well as trying a bunch of prompts with CLIP.

Is the code for this one available?

Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by sahil_chaudhary on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @10:58AM (#34709869)
Ah yes, this model treats this purely as image captioning. The model isn't open source yet.
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by badcppdev on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @04:37AM (#34706047)
Can you clarify whether or not Steve Buscemi actually took the photo?
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by tbalsam on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @10:07AM (#34709017)
This one also had me rolling, haha. Thank you, too. <3 :))))
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by aspyct on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @04:37AM (#34706042)
Pictures with zoom lenses, obviously :D
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by klondike_klive on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @05:28AM (#34706353)
This is the thing about AI that I find simultaneously wonderful and terrifying. Something to do with me as a human, noticing a hilarious detail amidst a fathomless ocean. It affirms my humanity but the backdrop is dizzying randomness.
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by the_generalist on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @06:04AM (#34706569)
How do you do fellow humans?
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by jabiko on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @06:20AM (#34706673)
Maybe it was trained on a image set of politicians. I put in a image Dr. Evil doing air quotes and it came up with "FirstName LastName from FirstName LastName in star trek the next generation ( 2005 ) ( 2 0 1 9 )".

FirstName LastName being the name of a politician.

Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by VicVee on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @09:41AM (#34708622)
His style is just so beautifully unique
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by zardo on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @11:31AM (#34710482)
A photo taken in the style Steve Buscemi would have if he were a photographer.
Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by tbalsam on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @10:05AM (#34708989)
I'm dying laughing right now, this is phenomenal comedy gold.

Thank you.

Re:Reverse engineer Stable Diffusion images by futhey on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @10:50PM (#34719541)
I generated a bunch of variations and eventually got something kinda close to your source, but it seems pretty hit or miss: https://i.pica.so/b014bb2f-ca05-499a-a4da-1d178f49bb06.jpg https://i.pica.so/5ee6e122-c2a4-44a7-8ae9-ecec24da0246.jpg