Re:Meta to Ask Many Managers to Become Individual Contributo...
by hotpotamus on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @03:50PM
(#34699383)
I've always like the term soldier. It's what organized crime syndicates, armies, and ant colonies all use. The worst is when someone gets called a "resource", but I can't get too exercised about IC.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta to Ask Many Managers to Become Individual Contributo...
by Moissanite on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @04:09PM
(#34699688)
As a consultant, I've become accustomed to being referred to as "the resource" by operations people. However, the day an engagement manager refers to me directly as "resource" is the day I openly start referring to them as my secretary.
Re:Meta to Ask Many Managers to Become Individual Contributo...
by zabzonk on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @04:30PM
(#34699988)
i keep envisaging what some of these uber stupid job names would look like on a business card i might have to give to a client:
zab zonk
the resource
zab zonk
individual contributor
jesus wept
Re:Meta to Ask Many Managers to Become Individual Contributo...
by tuckerman on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @05:39PM
(#34700879)
Nobody has IC as a title, it’s a whole class of job families that don’t require/revolve around managing other employees. Data Scientist, Software Engineer, Data Center Technician are all ICs. It’s just a more positive way of saying “not people manager”, especially when you are trying to build a culture that going into people management shouldn’t be the only career path.
Re:Meta to Ask Many Managers to Become Individual Contributo...
by zabzonk on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @06:06PM
(#34701222)
why do you need to say "not manager"? most people are in the nature of things not managers. and if you do need, for bad, bad reasons want to differentiate them, how about NMs? oh, but that would be to obvious for the current crop.