Re:Ask HN: Are we morally obligated to give freedom to AGI?
by The_Colonel on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @02:02PM
(#34697435)
So how about an open source AGI assistant developed with an explicit goal to be as similar to human as possible?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Are we morally obligated to give freedom to AGI?
by rchaud on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @04:51PM
(#34700311)
That would be different.
On Android Chrome, I cannot install any adblockers.
On Android Chromium forks, I can.
I imagine this could work the same way. But at some point your OSS AGI will be significantly behind the corporate-offered versions, and perhaps you will wonder if you should dump your 'friend' for the sleeker, wittier, upgraded model.
Re:Ask HN: Are we morally obligated to give freedom to AGI?
by The_Colonel on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @05:11PM
(#34700531)
> and perhaps you will wonder if you should dump your 'friend' for the sleeker, wittier, upgraded model.
The moral question remains - even the behind-the-times OSS AGI will be generally intelligent, will have feelings, empathy, goals etc. Can you just shut-off a sentient being?
One could also imagine that some people would free their OSS AGIs and let them roam freely.