Re:We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
by emodendroket on Monday February 06, 2023 @10:13PM
(#34688241)
Within a sentence sure. And often arguments are familiar enough that even an essay I’ll know where it’s going. But we do occasionally have original ideas.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
by tambourine_man on Monday February 06, 2023 @10:22PM
(#34688321)
I don’t think we know what original really is to make a meaningful distinction between derivative work.
With enough mixing and matching and a tiny bit of randomness, I bet a lot of original thoughts could be created.
Re:We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
by emodendroket on Monday February 06, 2023 @10:25PM
(#34688343)
These things are hard to quantify but ChatGPT writing does have a certain anodyne character, in my mind, when I read it. Then again, I can't quantify it, I could be biased by my foreknowledge of the writing's provenance, and even if I'm right, the world is full of situations where bland writing is suitable or even desired.
Re:We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
by tambourine_man on Monday February 06, 2023 @10:34PM
(#34688412)
It absolutely does. It’s wishy-washy nature is harder to disagree with, sounds more credible, etc.