Voice.ai: GPL Violations with a Side of DRM

Re:Voice.ai: GPL Violations with a Side of DRM by ronsor on Monday February 06, 2023 @02:52PM (#34683268)

So far I've also emailed the FSF ([email protected]) and am currently awaiting a response.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Voice.ai: GPL Violations with a Side of DRM by voakbasda on Monday February 06, 2023 @03:08PM (#34683546)

My understanding (which may be incorrect) is that the FSF actively defends copyright on GNU projects. They do not defend other projects, but they will consult with attorneys on matters of the licenses themselves.

Nevertheless, I (and I'm sure many others here on HN) would enjoy seeing the response from the FSF.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Voice.ai: GPL Violations with a Side of DRM by ronsor on Monday February 06, 2023 @03:12PM (#34683608)

Praat includes code from the GNU Scientific Library (GSL)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Voice.ai: GPL Violations with a Side of DRM by jraph on Monday February 06, 2023 @04:07PM (#34684336)

Maybe the Software Freedom Conservancy would be more suitable?

https://sfconservancy.org/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Voice.ai: GPL Violations with a Side of DRM by rascul on Monday February 06, 2023 @04:21PM (#34684548)

I think libgcrypt is a GNU project.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Voice.ai: GPL Violations with a Side of DRM by jacoblambda on Monday February 06, 2023 @08:53PM (#34687506)

This honestly is a really good reason for (A)GPL projects to use at least one GNU (A)GPL licensed dependency.

If someone does violate the license on your code, they are also transitively doing it to a bigger, angrier fish as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]