News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Alexis Ohanian vs NBC - Debating SOPA by badclient on Sunday January 15, 2012 @04:24PM (#3468300)
Once everyone agrees DNS filtering is just wrong, _then_ we can talk about their problems.

Your response is a perfect example of why we are failing the communication war. We simply want to get to the technical end: dns filtering is wrong.

Meanwhile, the opposition is saying: SOPA means more US jobs. You tell me which idea has a better chance of sticking in the average consumer's mind?

A better counter would be something like: SOPA means Americans going to jail for watching a YouTube video. Let them counter with "that's not true!". Well, it is as true as saying SOPA means more jobs.

Re:Alexis Ohanian vs NBC - Debating SOPA by chernevik on Sunday January 15, 2012 @05:26PM (#3468454)
It's a mistake to get into a shouting match with someone who has the money to shout much louder than you.
Re:Alexis Ohanian vs NBC - Debating SOPA by badclient on Sunday January 15, 2012 @08:31PM (#3468950)
Not really sure what you mean by that.
Re:Alexis Ohanian vs NBC - Debating SOPA by chernevik on Sunday January 15, 2012 @10:10PM (#3469173)
If we answer their lies with our lies, observers have to sort their way through a huge muddle. At that point, the contest comes down who can get their message out the best. And showbiz has the money, and the interest, to buy a lot more airtime than the SOPA opponents.

When you're right, you want to move the argument to principles and facts. You don't want the debate muddled, b/c the more people know the likelier they are to agree with you.

(Unless you mean that Youtube really does mean jail? I haven't tracked the less bad parts of the bill so closely.)