News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by newZWhoDis on Sunday February 05, 2023 @06:57PM (#34671275)
The Nimitz event is far from “debunked”.

We have multiple naval aviator eye witnesses of the physical object, with testimony (fravor and the female wingman, I forget her name)

We have testimony of the Princeton’s AEGIS radar operator that these things were “popping in at 80k feet and dropping to sea level in a few seconds”, that “they disappear on radar and the sub would get a ping in the same area tracking 200+ knots underwater”

We have the intentionally degraded video of the same object from another intercept (the people who went out after fravor, his jet didn’t have recording capability). This is the video a certain washed up video game developer claims to have debunked by pointing a flashlight at a webcam.

This operation was testing a new version of the navy’s most advanced radar/integrated tracking system at that time (2004) that was substantially more powerful/sensitive than anything that came before it. Make of that what you will.

Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by vallanceroad on Sunday February 05, 2023 @08:04PM (#34671874)
> the female wingman, I forget her name

Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich

Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by newZWhoDis on Monday February 06, 2023 @08:28PM (#34687268)
That’s it, thanks!
Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by dtx1 on Monday February 06, 2023 @06:10AM (#34675873)
> The Nimitz event is far from “debunked”.

But he googled $Event + Debunked and watched 2 minutes of the first explanation that came up. Mick West said it's debunked so it must be so, after all, any good skeptic will click the first link and believe any debunk instantly because that's the science way^tm

Re:As a US Navy fighter pilot, I witnessed unidentified anom... by lambo4bkfast on Monday February 06, 2023 @10:55PM (#34688572)
It is rather ironic