News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by jonasvp on Sunday January 15, 2012 @08:44AM (#3467115)
Funny, that's actually what I thought this article was about. Who gets excited about another "normal" running shoe anymore? I bought my Vibram FiveFingers after reading "Born to Run" and never looked back.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by felipemnoa on Sunday January 15, 2012 @12:29PM (#3467638)
It smells too much like a fad.

Edit: From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fad

>>A fad is any form of behavior that develops among a large population and is collectively followed with enthusiasm for some period, generally as a result of the behavior's being perceived as novel in some way.[1] A fad is said to "catch on" when the number of people adopting it begins to increase rapidly. The behavior will normally fade quickly once the perception of novelty is gone.[1]<<

I'm not sure that we are yet in the "large population" phase even though this is like the third time I've heard about this new footwear.

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by eaurouge on Sunday January 15, 2012 @02:37PM (#3467992)
You weren't born with shoes on your feet. Running barefoot is the natural way to run. If there's a fad in running, it is that you need to air cushions at your heels when you already have a superior mechanism to cushion your strides.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by jsankey on Sunday January 15, 2012 @04:46PM (#3468363)
Regardless of who is right, this is a weak argument. Barefoot may be the natural way to run, but that doesn't mean it's the best. The natural way to handle an infection is your immune system, but you'll be thankful for antibiotics when you need them. In short, it's possible for us to improve on "natural".
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by salemh on Sunday January 15, 2012 @04:59PM (#3468388)
Person dependent (like above comments on barefoot killing peoples shins, etc.) and cultural, like the Mexican-Indian (native) folks who drink, and run for 100's of miles (Born to Run book inspiration).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarahumara_people The word for themselves, Rarámuri, means "runners on foot" or "those who run fast" in their native tongue according to some early ethnographers like Norwegian Carl Lumholtz, though this interpretation has not been fully agreed upon. With widely dispersed settlements, these people developed a tradition of long-distance running up to 120 miles (190 km) in one session, over a period of two days through their homeland of rough canyon country, for intervillage communication and transportation as well as to hunt.

They also have the tendency to eat when hungry, sleep when sleepy (as in, anytime / anywhere) which has threads to other "genius" discussions (lets call being able to run 100's of miles a type of "physical genius" for a thought experiment). I know when I do barefoot walking on a frequent basis my chronic lower back pain starts to dissipate.

Side note: We also aren't naturally meant to sit all day in an office chair, yet...

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by eurleif on Sunday January 15, 2012 @05:00PM (#3468389)
But an infection your immune system can't handle is the exceptional case. Your body deals with most infections just fine on its own.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by DarkShikari on Sunday January 15, 2012 @05:15PM (#3468427)
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by eaurouge on Monday January 16, 2012 @01:39AM (#3469643)
I'll just say your second link is a completely illogical response to my comment.

Note, I'm not necessarily advocating barefoot running. I do run on my forefeet, so I run in Newtons, for now.

Two things though: (1) Heel running is less efficient, results in higher impact forces and leads to more injuries than forefoot running. (2) The only reason most of us heel run is because we started running in sneakers from a young age.

Again, your second link, did you even read it?

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by sopooneo on Sunday January 15, 2012 @07:47PM (#3468843)
I agree that it could be a fad, but couldn't it also be the start of a widespread and permanent change? Seems both situations would start the same way.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by GigabyteCoin on Sunday January 15, 2012 @09:08AM (#3467153)
How long before you think webbed-footed shoes are going to be acceptable in society?

That's pretty much the only thing holding me back from buying them or any of the funky new (curved bottom) shoe ideas, I know I would never wear them.

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by matwood on Sunday January 15, 2012 @09:24AM (#3467180)
I wear the Merrell Trailgloves, and they give much the same barefoot feel as the five finger but look like normal shoes. They are so light I often forget they are on. The zero rise from front to back also makes them great squatting and dead lifting shoes.

http://www.merrell.com/US/en-US/Product.mvc.aspx/22875M/5039...

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by latch on Sunday January 15, 2012 @10:36AM (#3467330)
I run with their Sonic Glove. I enjoy it. However, going downhill does way too much damage to my feet. Minimal/barefoot requires short strides with a high cadence and that's hard to do [for me] going downhill.

http://www.merrell.com/US/en-US/Product.mvc.aspx/24667M/5598...

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by kstenerud on Sunday January 15, 2012 @09:51AM (#3467242)
Second this. You can also get the brown leather edition: http://www.merrell.com/US/en-US/Product.mvc.aspx/22874M?gree...

I'll never buy a "normal" running shoe again.

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by mrtron on Sunday January 15, 2012 @04:57PM (#3468380)
I love the trailgloves too.

For regular walking/business shoes give Geox a try. The solid leather insole and lightweight build is amazing. The air transfer through the sole actually works too.

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by matwood on Sunday January 15, 2012 @09:18PM (#3469072)
Hah! I have Geox's also for business/dressier needs. Great shoes with a nice look.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by draggnar on Sunday January 15, 2012 @11:18AM (#3467449)
My favorite thing about the Vibrams is the ability to change directions and literally feel the ground with my toes. Your toes were made for a reason.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by chrismanfrank on Sunday January 15, 2012 @06:41PM (#3468661)
matwood, do they really compare to the feel of the vibram's? i think my favorite thing about the vibram's is how they let your toes spread out to help with balance and changing direction. do you get that same feel with the merrell's? i've been looking for something similar to vibra's that would also protect my feet on trails.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by matwood on Sunday January 15, 2012 @09:23PM (#3469084)
Well, obviously if you need/want the individual toe feel then they won't replace that. If you're looking for a barefoot shoe that is as minimal as the vibrams then they fit the bill. On my feet the Trailglove toebox is quite wide so my toes spread out inside the shoe. This spread doesn't transfer to the ground of course, but it does lead to the feeling of not wearing a shoe at all.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by jackfoxy on Sunday January 15, 2012 @11:21AM (#3467460)
I don't worry about social acceptability. I have a pair of VFFs for the gym and one for daily wear. They are a great conversation starter, and strangers ask me about them a lot. The one thing they are not good for is standing around. After realizing this and some experimentation I switched to work boots with Dr. Scholl's arch support when I spend a lot of time just standing.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by sliverstorm on Sunday January 15, 2012 @01:48PM (#3467860)
I find the VFFs feel awful when you are not moving. I have a co-worker who wears them all the time, but I can't stand sitting around with them on.

(This could be my foot's fault though, my smallest toe gets scrunched up in the shoe "fingers")

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by cpenner461 on Sunday January 15, 2012 @05:16PM (#3468429)
Agreed. I tried wearing them for a while, and while they were fine for running, I couldn't just wear them around casually and they always felt sooo good to take off. They're sized by length, so I had the right size but they were just too narrow for my foot.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by grannyg00se on Sunday January 15, 2012 @11:02AM (#3467397)
I wear mine at the gym and sometimes to/from the gym as well. Why wait for them to become common? In what way are they not acceptable? I challenge anybody not to serve me at a restaurant, or allow me into their store, or kick me out of my place of work because of the shoes I've chosen. How absurd.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by GigabyteCoin on Sunday January 15, 2012 @08:34PM (#3468957)
Obviously you don't frequent many high end restaurants/clubs.

I have been turned away from places for wearing jeans before. I doubt they would allow me in looking like frog man.

It's more "those places" I was talking about. Sure, nobody is going to scoff at what I wear around my condo.

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by grannyg00se on Monday January 16, 2012 @03:38PM (#3472319)
I do frequent high end restaurants and clubs. But not being "acceptable in society" leading to "never wearing them" is quite different from not being acceptable in a high end restaurant or club.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by ahelwer on Sunday January 15, 2012 @09:25AM (#3467185)
Depends what you mean by acceptable. I work in your standard jeans-and-a-polo software shop, and there are a few people who wear them. That may just be part of the company culture though (in Calgary, so lots of hiking/biking/skiing types).

If you mean acceptable in semi-formal or even business casual settings, I would say that will just never happen.

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by kemayo on Sunday January 15, 2012 @12:55PM (#3467716)
I wear mine around all the time. (Well, not at the moment, because I want something warmer for winter.) I get comments about them, mostly from people who're wondering what they are, but I've never seen anything negative.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by sliverstorm on Sunday January 15, 2012 @01:47PM (#3467852)
There's a couple other options out there; you can get a pair of web-footed shoes for special use, and a pair of minimalist closed-toed shoes for regular use. The web-footing will always feel cooler, but you can walk/run in minimalist shoes the same way.

The Merrrell trail shoe someone linked is a good example. I have a pair of pumas that are very similar, though a little more boring.

Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by blader on Sunday January 15, 2012 @01:12PM (#3467764)
I've worn my Vibrams exclusively (even to 2 weddings) for the past 4 years, and it's been great for my social life. It's probably the best ice breaker ever invented. Strangers regularly approach and start conversations.
Re:The Greatest Running Shoe Never Sold by chrismanfrank on Sunday January 15, 2012 @06:38PM (#3468650)
That is a great reason to wear them. My wife and I both wear Vibram's (we even did a Tough Mudder event in them), and they're great for starting conversations on the trail. Of course, if you don't like small-talk with strangers, they will be a nightmare :)