Re:Minimum Viable Process
by beckingz on Sunday February 05, 2023 @01:21PM
(#34667275)
Better to parse it as "position yourself to be better positioned in the future as the environment changes" I think.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Minimum Viable Process
by O__________O on Sunday February 05, 2023 @02:14PM
(#34667938)
Maybe, though this is assumed via “overall ecosystem dynamics” and “ maximizing future opportunities available” - since in some situations having a less optimal position in the near future is the optimal response long term, though maybe you’re including “better” to cover that, but then to me better feels redundant.