News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Longer Discussions in HN? by lolinder on Sunday February 05, 2023 @10:58AM (#34665879)
YC and dang's approach to HN seems to be more or less this: "Somehow we stumbled upon a system that really works. We don't know why it does, but it does, and so we don't want to change things too much too fast lest we break it."

And honestly, I love that approach. In my time on HN features have rolled out slowly, and you can tell that they were selected very carefully as being important quality of life improvements that don't fundamentally change the interactions.

Most features that people propose that HN needs are likely to substantially or subtly alter the dynamics, with potentially catastrophic results over the long haul.

Re:Longer Discussions in HN? by O__________O on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:43AM (#34666320)
My impression is dang makes a lot of behind the scenes changes, but few public changes. As such, they’re hard to notice and really become a topic. There a lot of features HN has that most users don’t know about and/or use too.
Re:Longer Discussions in HN? by marojejian on Sunday February 05, 2023 @07:53PM (#34671793)
This may be true. But I think the greater value of HN is in fact the community: the set of people who use it and the norms that have emerged, more than the features. I think encouraging more "slow" conversation would improve this community, and it would not be too risky to test out more default comments notification.

I use HN replies (and RSS)... but very few others do, so the the change of getting a reply to this comment is low, even though I got here within a day.

Re:Longer Discussions in HN? by lolinder on Sunday February 05, 2023 @09:57PM (#34672731)
Hi! I don't use HN replies, but I do go back and check my less-than-day-old comments.

When I say a system, I'm including everything, including the community. It's not any one part of HN, it's the way all the parts interact. Seemingly small changes can have a dramatic impact on the way the system operates, which includes the community. Suddenly different voices become amplified while others feel marginalized, and it's hard to predict if that will be a good outcome.

I'm not saying that it would for sure be a problem, but I sympathize with dang wanting to be very careful before introducing something like that.

Re:Longer Discussions in HN? by marojejian on Monday February 06, 2023 @10:54AM (#34679201)
Nice, thanks for the reply! I agree - I'm also very sympathetic to that. In this case, I think it is an example of a feature worth experimenting with, even if slowly. I would love to have more slow threads like this one.