News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AMD Killed the Itanium by nullc on Saturday February 04, 2023 @09:20AM (#34654674)
I don't think building a threaded cpu that switches threads to hide memory latency would be philosophically incompatible with VLIW. I think the later generation itaniums were threaded too.

On x86 SMT gets a bad rap because its never been tremendously effective. It's much more effective in IBM's implementation on Power. It wouldn't be hard to imagine some Itanium SMT monster.

Re:AMD Killed the Itanium by yosefk on Saturday February 04, 2023 @09:39AM (#34654810)
How many threads would it take to hide 100ns of DRAM access latency and what serial performance would we get?
Re:AMD Killed the Itanium by nullc on Saturday February 04, 2023 @09:02PM (#34660859)
It doesn't have to be hidden completely, there are still caches.

With 2 unstalled threads you effectively halve it (in terms of throughput), 4 unstalled threads you effectively quarter it, etc.

Re:AMD Killed the Itanium by Kon-Peki on Saturday February 04, 2023 @10:46AM (#34655289)
> It wouldn't be hard to imagine some Itanium SMT monster.

Itanium did have SMT