News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AMD Killed the Itanium by throwawaymaths on Saturday February 04, 2023 @07:12AM (#34653874)
Iirc caches mostly exist to help keep pipelines full. You could maybe imagine an architecture with deterministic memory access times from specified regions.
Re:AMD Killed the Itanium by cwzwarich on Saturday February 04, 2023 @09:36AM (#34654790)
Such architectures exist (e.g. for signal processing). They just aren't good for running general-purpose software.
Re:AMD Killed the Itanium by Kon-Peki on Saturday February 04, 2023 @10:44AM (#34655279)
Itanium sold, barely, and still has people using it. But, as you can imagine, not with general-purpose software.

By the 2nd or 3rd generation, Intel had made some changes that really improved performance a lot. Was the final generation of Itanium the 4th generation?

Re:AMD Killed the Itanium by nordsieck on Saturday February 04, 2023 @11:32AM (#34655637)
> You could maybe imagine an architecture with deterministic memory access times from specified regions.

Sure.

But it's very easy to level down. And almost impossible to level up.

Re:AMD Killed the Itanium by anonymoushn on Saturday February 04, 2023 @07:03PM (#34659923)
> Iirc caches mostly exist to help keep pipelines full

You can find out by disabling the stride prefetcher and observing the 90+% performance regression in all your software!