No, you completely miss the point.

It's like complaining that a musician cannot practice their instrument without software that requires you to be always-online.

> Even if it was open source no user would be able to run it locally anyway.

You are just stating this, it does not make it true. Several of us are running GPT-3 workloads locally.

> Several of us are running GPT-3 workloads locally.

Unless you work for OpenAI (and your “local” machine somehow has 1TB+ of VRAM, equivalent to roughly 25 A100s), this cannot possibly be true…

1.7k forks… https://github.com/openai/gpt-3

apart from that, several pre trained corpuses had been around for a while

That repo just seems to be a bunch of JSON files and sample outputs. Am I missing something?

Very strange counterpoint that makes no sense unless you're just arguing against cloud software in general, which was clearly not the point the parent made.

> Several of us are running GPT-3 workloads locally.

Several people out of 8 billion is the same as no-one. The point made was that anyone should be able to run this document assistant on their local machine.

> Several of us are running GPT-3 workloads locally.

Do you mind sharing how? I didn't think the model was available to download and thought it was api only?

* * *

In this day and age there is no way a well funded University Lab can build a model that is even a fraction as good as GPT-3. Just look at "Bloom", from BigScience a commendable effort but useless for any real world use case compared to GPT-3. Unfortunately moving forward, if you want to build useful apps that use ML Models, you need to call API's from well funded Industry groups.