The Future (and the Past) of the Web Is Server Side Rendering

Re:The Future (and the Past) of the Web Is Server Side Rende... by no_wizard on Friday February 03, 2023 @07:08PM (#34649689)

I assume that converters have negative side effects?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Future (and the Past) of the Web Is Server Side Rende... by recursive on Friday February 03, 2023 @10:33PM (#34651154)

I'm unaware of their existence. I'm guessing they're big and expensive. Or maybe hard to get?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Future (and the Past) of the Web Is Server Side Rende... by fshr on Friday February 03, 2023 @11:13PM (#34651441)

What kind of outputs? Fiber to analog is about $15 and the size of two hockey pucks stacked.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Future (and the Past) of the Web Is Server Side Rende... by recursive on Saturday February 04, 2023 @12:21AM (#34651794)

Huh. Ok. I just didn't know that was a thing. Ok, I guess I don't need analog outputs then. Still nice to have though. Better zero pucks than two.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Future (and the Past) of the Web Is Server Side Rende... by pas on Sunday February 05, 2023 @08:24PM (#34672030)

Hifi geeks don't trust the DAC to something inside the TV, and ... they are not wrong. Plus you can reuse the DAC even if you change the screen.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Future (and the Past) of the Web Is Server Side Rende... by recursive on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:59PM (#34673534)

I'm not an audiophile. I just want something better than what the screen does, and I don't want to buy a soundbar or get into HDMI. And sometimes use headphones.

But still, I'm pretty sure, one day I'm going to get one of these optical -> analog boxes.

[ Parent | on HN ]