News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ChatGPT: The Slickest Con Artist of All Time by hansvm on Friday February 03, 2023 @01:06PM (#34645257)
If you're able to validate the results though (so they logically fit together, or with that newfound vocabulary and pseudounderstanding can you search for that information elsewhere), is that really such a bad thing? I've been doing exactly that to quickly ramp up on some new numerical algorithms I previously didn't know existed.
Re:ChatGPT: The Slickest Con Artist of All Time by naniwaduni on Friday February 03, 2023 @03:27PM (#34647256)
That's a really big if.
Re:ChatGPT: The Slickest Con Artist of All Time by hansvm on Friday February 03, 2023 @03:57PM (#34647611)
Why? It's the same standard you need to apply to anything else.