Agree. It's quite the jump going from a user-centric website to a space launch company that is used by corporations and governments. Like, okay, I guess SpaceX is extremely accessible compared to other options in the space industry, but why would that have any bearing on how accessible the Twitter website is for you and me day-to-day?

Starlink has created more information accessibility that twitter will ever will

But that’s not in any way shape or form the “accessibility” being talked about here.

Just because it’s the same word does not mean it’s the same meaning.

I wasn't sure how to put it into words and this was exactly what I had in mind.

Yes, but since we are judging a person for his merit…

Do you understand where you are?

This is a comment thread discussing accessibility at Twitter, in a post about Twitter discontinuing part of its platform. It’s not a place to circlejerk Musk’s achievements, regardless how much you would want that to be so.

Explain, in exact words, what about SpaceX in any way shape or form would indicate that they know how to handle user a11y and how that would transfer over to Twitter— you know, the thing we’re actually discussing here.

Most accessible (by cost) launch provider.