Python's “Disappointing” Superpowers

Re:Python's “Disappointing” Superpowers by vore on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @07:05PM (#34620105)

This argument is in such bad faith it's hilarious.

Here's my much better argument: Instead of using dynamic typing, eating babies reduces the incidence of bugs in code by 1000x. If you don't believe me and would like me to cite a source, you first provide a citation saying something different to what I'm saying and I'll provide my citations. Come on, you can do it! (Hint: You can't)

If it really was a strong claim, you could disprove it easily.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Python's “Disappointing” Superpowers by ReflectedImage on Thursday February 02, 2023 @06:53AM (#34625337)

And yet I eventually provided evidence for what I'm saying and the other party provided nothing at all.

It's not bad faith because you don't like the arguments conclusions.

[ Parent | on HN ]