Re:Introducing ChatGPT Plus
by billythemaniam on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @06:44PM
(#34619878)
I don't really see the issue. You are using a service called GhostWrite which uses ChatGPT under the hood. OpenAI/ChatGPT would be considered a sub-processor of GhostWrite. What am I missing?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
How are they using ChatGPT - is there an API? Or is this simply abuse of TOS?
Re:Introducing ChatGPT Plus
by LeoPanthera on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @07:34PM
(#34620352)
They're not using ChatGPT, they're using GPT-3, which has an API. There is a ChatGPT API coming but it's not available yet.
It is infuriating how everyone is describing all GPT models as "ChatGPT". It's very misleading.
Re:Introducing ChatGPT Plus
by chewmieser on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @07:40PM
(#34620399)
Supposedly the comment section describes a hidden model that you can use via the API that actually is ChatGPT. One of the libraries mentioned in these comments is using it.
In case anyone wants to replace davinci-003 with the chat GPT model, the name is `text-chat-davinci-002-20230126`
Seems this leaked ChatGPT API model got taken down already..
https://github.com/acheong08/ChatGPT/issues/523
https://github.com/acheong08/ChatGPT/issues/523#issuecomment...
On properly designed privacy respecting systems, the client sends the request to the trusted server with whatever API keys are needed to make it work.
But that would break the server lock-in subscript model, so only downloadable software would work.