$20/mo, for the people in this situation, is not an amount of money worth thinking about.

> I agree, it's stupid to pay $20 for something you can get for 2 cents

> $20/mo, for the people in this situation, is not an amount of money worth thinking about.

I don't follow this logic. In this case everything that is currently sold for 2 cents can also be sold for $20, because "it is not an amount of money worth thinking about" (at least for some people).

For some people.

Your perception of money really isn't consistent with the vast majority, I'd imagine.

Frivolously throwing money at unnecessary subscriptions isn't something for me.

You get to call this frivolous, but my perception of money isn't consistent?

Interesting.

> consistent with the vast majority

As ever the whole sentence is important, rather than just picking out a part of it.

What part did I miss?

> with the vast majority