News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A manifesto on shower temperature control by Someone on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @03:08PM (#34616804)
> you can change the top end by lowering the temperature of your hot water heater. We have ours set at 120

I’m not sure that’s a good idea. 120F is in the danger zone for Legionnaires' disease. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legionnaires%27_disease#Preven...:

“Keep water temperature either above or below the 20–50 °C (68–122 °F) range in which the Legionella bacterium thrives.”

Re:A manifesto on shower temperature control by adamj9431 on Wednesday February 01, 2023 @08:57PM (#34621041)
Interesting. On the other hand, when bringing a newborn home from the hospital, the take-home literature instructs new parents to turn the water heater down to 120 F to prevent risk of scalding.
Re:A manifesto on shower temperature control by stdbrouw on Thursday February 02, 2023 @02:41AM (#34623428)
I wouldn't worry about it. Almost every modern boiler will bump up the temperature to 60C / 140F once a week to prevent Legionnaire's, may even be a mandatory feature depending on where you live.
Re:A manifesto on shower temperature control by exmadscientist on Thursday February 02, 2023 @12:15AM (#34622382)
The "right" way to do this is a thermostatic mixing valve at the water heater output. This lets you keep the tank at 150°F (or whatever) but the output gets mixed down to 120°F (or whatever). It also gives you an effectively-larger tank which can be very useful in certain cases.

Of course, you might say, why not put the thermostatic mixing valve at or in the shower, which also works pretty well!

Re:A manifesto on shower temperature control by kps on Thursday February 02, 2023 @09:44PM (#34636500)
> the 20–50 °C (68–122 °F) range

That's clearly a case of conversion results being given unwarranted precision.