No, ionization detectors are still around. They're better for detecting flame fires than optical. Think of when you've seen a campfire and there's been little smoke. There was definitely a fire, but an optical detector wouldn't have detected it.
In contrast, optical is better for smoking fires. Best practice is to have some of each. In fact, I believe some models have both in the same unit.
http://www.nfpa.org/Public-Education/Staying-safe/Safety-equ...
> But of course there's many still around, sadly
I hope not.
PSA: most smoke detectors have a lifespan of 10 years. Smoke detectors from the 80s would be mostly useless now, 40+ years later.
https://www.allstate.com/resources/home-insurance/how-long-d...
Another PSA: while you're replacing your old smoke detectors, if you have combustion heat, consider replacing some of them with ones that also detect CO. (You'll have to replace them in 5-7years, though.)
But of course there's many still around, sadly