The Limits of Computational Photography

Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by pkulak on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @12:24PM (#34598200)

I've got an Olympus M43 camera, which has an image sensor that's both significantly smaller than full frame, and significantly larger than a phone. I've found that I can do absolutely amazing things to the RAW image later. There are these processes now that will use ML to remove noise, and it blows my mind every time. I can shoot at ISO 6400 now without even thinking about it. I used to cringe when I had to hit 1600.

Olympus (OM Systems?) should build this stuff into their cameras. I used to have a bit of inkling to some day "upgrade" to full frame, but not any more.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by Tarrosion on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @03:37PM (#34601600)

I'm also shooting on an Olympus M43, several years old. Any suggestions for software tools you've found helpful?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by pkulak on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @03:53PM (#34601899)

Yeah, didn't want to sound like a shill, but Dx0 is so good I run it in a virtual machine on my Linux box. It's "Deep Prime" noise reduction thing is what I was talking about. There are others, even some stand alone, but it's nice having it all in one place, and Deep Prime does seem to be the best.

[ Parent | on HN ]