News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Limits of Computational Photography. Parent comment

Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by dwringer on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @09:49AM (#34595655)
I have used a program called Pixel Fixer which can learn a profile of each of your cameras and directly process out the dead pixels in the RAW files in a batch operation.

It hasn't been updated in about 8 years so it doesn't necessarily support anything too recent, and is not open source, but I had some success with using it.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by causi on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @12:13PM (#34598006)
Does it support jpegs? Most of the cameras in question don't support RAW output but the problems are individual stuck pixels that are identical between every shot.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by dwringer on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @12:55PM (#34598784)
Unfortunately it looks like the author only listed the possibility of future JPEG support, but it was not implemented.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by causi on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @01:17PM (#34599224)
Dang. The only thing I've found that comes close is a program called PixelZap, but it hasn't been updated since 2002 and the functionality to purchase the paid version probably just sends your credit info to Russia.
[ Parent | on HN ]