News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Limits of Computational Photography. Parent comment

Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by wombat_trouble on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @01:48AM (#34592055)
I see invented texture and layering here: https://yager.io/comp/mi.jpeg
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by kaba0 on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @03:25AM (#34592693)
That seems just like edge sharpening.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by jefftk on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @08:44AM (#34594904)
It's pretty hard to tell without knowing what sort of image was input to the computational photography process
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by MichaelZuo on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @10:26AM (#34596253)
The actual image is right below it in the post.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by jefftk on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @10:45AM (#34596559)
That's the image captured by a different camera (it's labeled "Fujifilm X-T5" and is from a different angle). The input I'm interested here is what the phone camera's sensor received prior to processing.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Limits of Computational Photography by MichaelZuo on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @11:24AM (#34597211)
He mentions that the phone did display something close to that for a brief moment.
[ Parent | on HN ]