Re:Cistercian Numerals
by sbussard on Monday January 30, 2023 @11:53PM
(#34591316)
Oh how I wish the glyphs started at the top right and moved anti clockwise one quadrant for each power of two, to be consistent with right handed coordinate systems
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Yup, and besides the counter-clockwise for consistency, I would like them even more if:
* Each stroke were 1 bit, so the numerals would be just a more "compact" representation for binary numbers.
* Even better if they can be represented with a seven-segment display (or other similar displays).
(Though I can't blame them, since these two things didn't even exist back then.)
Re:Cistercian Numerals
by downvotetruth on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @08:42PM
(#34605191)
Glyphs have to be written in an orientation; bidirection (or higher symmetric) layouts would impose either writing the words left to right & right to left, which would cause smearing when writing with ink with a dominant hand, or mirroring the glyphs themselves, which would make reading & writing words much more difficult.