Fish (shell) porting to Rust from C++

Re:Fish (shell) porting to Rust from C++ by jacquesm on Monday January 30, 2023 @11:05PM (#34590882)

From my own experience with that branch of industry: you won't hear about it because it is likely not open source and those building it don't bother with such things as online communities for project visibility and so on.

But in government and very large businesses (banks, insurance companies, airlines) I would not be surprised at all if there was still greenfield COBOL work done. Just not nearly as much as say in the mid 80's.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fish (shell) porting to Rust from C++ by theshrike79 on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @01:21AM (#34591907)

That "green field" is pretty sure only done because all the fields next to it are made of COBOL.

If they truly have a green field to develop on, nobody will pick COBOL.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fish (shell) porting to Rust from C++ by jacquesm on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @05:33AM (#34593516)

Ah, the 'no true green Scotsman' argument ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fish (shell) porting to Rust from C++ by theshrike79 on Tuesday January 31, 2023 @06:18AM (#34593780)

See also the ton of "No True C++man" arguments in this thread :)

Yes, modern C++ may be pretty good, but how many people actually get to write it instead of sticking with the tried and true ye olde versions actually in the codebase.

[ Parent | on HN ]