> plot(x, y, col=..., col.name=...)
> In this case, col.name is literally just a symbol.
In this case, col.name is literally… made up?How does it feel to be a spiteful pedant?
> plot(x, y, col=..., col.name=...)
> In this case, col.name is literally just a symbol.
In this case, col.name is literally… made up?
For example, plotting in R always baffled me.
plot(x, y, col=..., col.name=...)
In this case, col.name is literally just a symbol. But in another context col.name is the data with index 'name' stored in col. Or something, it's been a while.
R seems to have a lot of these 'special contexts' that A. make understanding and writing code much quicker and B. reward familiarity over intuition. One R line can be 100 in Julia, and both compile to 80 machine instructions, for example.
I'd say if you can agree with others on what R code does and you're comfortable with R, then use R. If you need to build something performant with many domains, then Julia is a great language.