The bit that's gets me is how fast does earth spin (without which sun rise is a bit hard to explain). Until it was accepted that air was just a thin atmospheric layer, it becomes insane to imagine we spin at a 1,000 miles an hour though a air medium that extends to Jupiter. How do you keep your newspaper still.
Kids today have Mickey Mouse cartoons explaining space rockets, moon to mars, earth spinning etc. We just accept it as true without trying to be clever about it
The same is true for literacy and numeracy - just having a society where you absorb character arcs, sub clauses, chapters, publishing, versions etc makes so much difference. Mathematical symbols were the names of Ed Sheeran albums.
Look at something simple like git - most business users should have this all the time but it's not a world view
(#) Look for episode on the podcast "Subject to chnage"
The only thing I'm not convinced about is whether programming is something of a functional specialisation or if it will (GAS already?) become a literacy-like thing.
I mean, we generally think of numeracy as something widespread in the West for the past few decades, but the average person really does not do even basic arithmetic very well. Are we really going to do a better job of teaching people programming, or will we have to resign to the reality that most people won't learn it well?