Re:Contracts you should never sign
by glenstein on Friday January 27, 2023 @10:45AM
(#34547307)
It is a misread to equivocate between stylistic objections and a criticism that was not about stylistic objections and suggest that both were expressing the same idea.
Endorsing the misread as the cost of doing business in order to reject a comment over stylistic objections signals that misreading is to be embraced as a community value.
Re:Contracts you should never sign
by Karunamon on Friday January 27, 2023 @10:48AM
(#34547336)
Which I didn't do? Nobody misread anything. The comment is objectively nasty and sarcastic, against the rules of the site, and I asked you to consider that substantive comments are best addressed to other substantive comments.
Endorsing the misread as the cost of doing business in order to reject a comment over stylistic objections signals that misreading is to be embraced as a community value.