That's sort of outdated. Python now has type hints, protocol oriented programming support, and is quite fast (for what it is). This wasn't the case back in the day but it's all there now.

Python might have nice features, but it also has terrible features. Like using dicts for everything. It's not enough to allow good practices, you have to prevent (or at least reduce) bad practices.

You can use dataclasses instead of dict now.

Unless you use __slots__, aren't all class-based objects [specifically python2 new style `class MyClass(object): pass` or all python3 classes] dicts in Python?

I was talking about the dataclasses.dataclass annotation in 3.10/3.11. You can use slots with it.

You’re right, they’re dicts unless slots are used. I read the parent comment and saying you can define types easily. But you can with dataclasses

Can you elaborate? What exactly is wrong with dicts?

>Like using dicts for everything

Sorry what? This is absolutely not true.

I think they meant that the underlying representation for most stuff is a dict.

Global variables are stored in a dict (`vars()`). Unless you use slots, an object is essentially a dict

Doesn't really disturb me because they're not used like a dict in practice though

Rubys biggest downfall was the stupid "fancy" syntax stuff in the language, like not requiring parenthesis or return statements, insert operators, BEGIN/END blocks, e.t.c. All of those make the code base harder to read.

Also I remember the dependency management system was a pain in the ass to deal with, especially with modules with native libraries.

Python had some issues with 2, but when 3 came around and fixed all that, it became the language of choice specifically because of its consistency.