I charge my EV at home. I’ve charged my EV on someone elses charge (because i needed it, not because I got a better parking space) maybe twice since i moved to an EV with a 180 mile range. Heck, even with my “first gen” EV with a 63 mile range, I charged at home 95ish percent of the time, and those days are behind us now.
$2k to run a 240v external outlet, $500 for a charge station, and you’re set. Apartment dwellers still have issues, but thats simply because govmt/demand hasnt insisted yet.
This could be solved today by using Tesla's Supercharging network, or at least their NACS[0] connector in the North American market. I know that auto makers don't want to rely on each other for _reasons_ but siding with Tesla would give them an instant charging network and completely solve the problem in one go.
[0] https://www.tesla.com/blog/opening-north-american-charging-s...
The one thing that EVs require is an EV charger network to exist in the foreign countries that Toyota sells the cars to. Without an existing EV charger network, it becomes a chicken and the egg problem for Toyota since, as a Japanese company, it would likely would face a difficult time getting financing to build an EV charger network in foreign countries.
Hydrogen fuel theoretically would just be an adaption of the existing petrol gas station infrastructure so the existing players/gas station networks would just need to switch over.
Now that ElectrifyAmerica is more "a thing", Toyota can start shifting strategies.
VW and US car brands could move faster since they were required (VW) and had government support (US car brands) to finance the US EV network. The Korean autos switched earlier as they were probably more hungry than the Japanese incumbents.
There's also the game theoretical play that being the only major petrol based auto producer could lead to pricing power if the transition takes longer than expected.