News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sexual loneliness: A neglected public health problem? by godelski on Thursday January 26, 2023 @01:34PM (#34536395)
What the parent is really talking about is that people in close proximity for extended periods are going through shared experiences. If you spend time with people and experience similar things then you will start to form emotional bonds with them. The parent could have also replaced partners with friends and the statement would hold true for the same reasons.

On the other hand, let's do the same analogy and replace partners with friends for the goals of apps. I think it would be obvious to many that these wouldn't be good platforms to build strong friendships on. If Tinder is the equivalent of asking someone out at a bar it is also similar to approaching someone at a bar and asking them to be your best friend. It might happen, but odds likely aren't in your favor, and especially not if you're not someone that likes to go bar hopping.

Re:Sexual loneliness: A neglected public health problem? by seydor on Thursday January 26, 2023 @01:53PM (#34536765)
I was thinking of social networks mostly. Tinder is an antisocial, hookup app
Re:Sexual loneliness: A neglected public health problem? by godelski on Thursday January 26, 2023 @02:04PM (#34536971)
I honestly don't believe that social networks bring us closer together. They can, but in practice they don't. Instead I believe they give us the illusion of feeling closer and more involved, but that is likely cognitive dissonance (akin to thinking ChatGPT is smart because it speaks). The only way to build relationships is through shared experiences. This can be done online btw, but these experiences are not doing things like liking peoples posts or occasionally commenting in threads. They involved personal and/or group conversations/activities. That's why you're more likely to find friends playing videogames online than through a social network (assuming pure online).