Re:An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyer...
by Miraste on Thursday January 26, 2023 @11:09AM
(#34533561)
That case, to me, is indicative of a larger problem - it's 75 pages of arcane justifications, and yet I already knew how all of the justices had voted just from reading the premise, because like every Supreme Court case in a politicized area it was decided by personal conviction and the rest is post-hoc rationalization.
There is no hallucination on the part of the humans involved, only intellectual dishonesty.
There is no hallucination on the part of the humans involved, only intellectual dishonesty.