Re:An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyer...
by patentatt on Thursday January 26, 2023 @11:11AM
(#34533605)
Sure, but citing a non-existent case would be clearly wrong. That was the hypothetical the post above gave.
Re:An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyer...
by lolinder on Thursday January 26, 2023 @11:49AM
(#34534269)
> The difference between tax evasion and tax avoidance might be the smallest proveable piece of evidence. A word, an email, an assumption, an ommission etc.
This seems like evidence that I'm right, not that I'm wrong. The tiniest facts matter, and an AI that is prone to making up facts wholesale would totally screw up a case.
The difference between tax evasion and tax avoidance might be the smallest proveable piece of evidence. A word, an email, an assumption, an ommission etc.