What if AI didn't make you a bad writer, but a better thinker?

Re:What if AI didn't make you a bad writer, but a better thi... by jason-phillips on Thursday January 26, 2023 @10:13AM (#34532617)

My statement assumes parity which describes an ideal scenario. I believe that's what the parent described from his experience, today.

Assuming subterfuge then my statement wouldn't apply, obviously, as the flow of information wouldn't exactly be symmetric. Symmetric information flow implies a commitment to operate in good faith with free exchange.

Edited to address this point:

> Eventually it becomes some flavor of omniscient.

The trick will be to maintain parity. This may be a fool's errand, but that point is key. It may be that only 0.01% of intellects eventually maintain symmetric conversation with AI, but that is important, nonetheless.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:What if AI didn't make you a bad writer, but a better thi... by andai on Thursday January 26, 2023 @03:39PM (#34538467)

> The trick will be to maintain parity. This may be a fool's errand, but that point is key. It may be that only 0.01% of intellects eventually maintain symmetric conversation with AI, but that is important, nonetheless.

We're putting a lot more energy into making machines smarter than into making humans smarter. Maybe it's because the former actually seems possible ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]