Re:Meta Ending Suspension of Trump’s Accounts
by sedivy94 on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:09AM
(#34527893)
That’s a reference to the dozens of Americans detained for over a year with no charges or due process. I would pick a different hill to die on.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta Ending Suspension of Trump’s Accounts
by stonogo on Thursday January 26, 2023 @01:31AM
(#34528356)
Not that I believe you can show me anyone in prison for, or being charged with, "walking through a building," but the point of my question was whether it was impossible to believe that a change in policy at Meta could possibly be the result of good-faith reconsideration of the debate. Instead I got fanfiction with irrelevant agenda-fueled talking points. I'm not dying on any hills, I'm asking why the distraction instead of just considering the possibility that someone might agree with him. Getting this much flak about it is wild.