News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Cal.com: The Open-Source Calendly Alternative. Parent comment

Re:Cal.com: The Open-Source Calendly Alternative by stonogo on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @02:33PM (#34508916)
It also constitutes a misunderstanding of the license. There's no need to clone into public view if you are your only user.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cal.com: The Open-Source Calendly Alternative by emurlin on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @03:35PM (#34509913)
I was thinking the same, but according to [1] some parameters like the hostname are hard-coded. So, that might be why you need to make the code public on GitHub (although still, technically you can still comply with the AGPL with a private repository).

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34508935

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cal.com: The Open-Source Calendly Alternative by ssddanbrown on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @08:12PM (#34513021)
I've raised this with them previously but they were adamant their wording was correct. I have details of my conversations with them within my repo [1] where I store examples of licensing confusion.

[1] https://github.com/ssddanbrown/Open-Source-Confusers#calcom

[ Parent | on HN ]