Re:CNET's AI Journalist Appears to Have Committed Extensive ...
by williamcotton on Tuesday January 24, 2023 @09:50AM
(#34504250)
The only true statement here is this: there's not a lot of use to be had from arguing over if something "seems smart" or "is smart".
As for how this relates to plagiarism... well, it doesn't really. Someone can "seem smart" and also not be guilty of plagiarism. Someone can "be smart" and be guilty of plagiarism.
That's debatable, and it's not necessarily true. Just the other day, we saw a story here (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34474043) that suggested that a language model trained on Othello game transcripts did in fact build a latent-space "mental model" of the board state. By perturbating the latent space, the researchers could argue that the model wasn't simply parroting memorized game sequences.
Of course, this isn't to say that AI plagiarism is impossible or even unlikely. Plagiarism is a shortcut to acceptable quality output, and AI systems excel at finding shortcuts to acceptable output.