News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchy [DeepMind, 2022] by naasking on Monday January 23, 2023 @02:56PM (#34494078)
> The "smallest meaningful unit of distance" stuff is nonsense.

Why?

Re:Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchy [DeepMind, 2022] by consilient on Monday January 23, 2023 @04:50PM (#34495577)
You get the Planck units by setting c, hbar, G, and Boltzmann's constant to 1. This is convenient for notational purposes but it has no inherent physical significance.
Re:Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchy [DeepMind, 2022] by naasking on Monday January 23, 2023 @04:57PM (#34495674)
That isn't the only way to argue for a minimal significant distance. Arguably QM sets a strict ~60-70 digit precision limit on physical constants [1], beyond which you arguably can't differentiate between discrete and continuous theories, and so a minimum distance seems like a perfectly sensible way to frame it.

[1] https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/16889/non-comput...